Apollonius <Pergaeus>, Apollonii Pergaei Conicorvm Lib. V. VI. VII. paraphraste Abalphato Asphahanensi : nunc primum editi ; additvs in calce Archimedis assvmptorvm liber, ex codibvs arabicis mss Abrahamus Ecchellensis Maronita latinos reddidit, Jo. Alfonsvs Borellvs curam in geometricis versione contulit & [et] notas vberiores in vniuersum opus adiecit

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 201]
[Figure 202]
[Figure 203]
[Figure 204]
[Figure 205]
[Figure 206]
[Figure 207]
[Figure 208]
[Figure 209]
[Figure 210]
[Figure 211]
[Figure 212]
[Figure 213]
[Figure 214]
[Figure 215]
[Figure 216]
[Figure 217]
[Figure 218]
[Figure 219]
[Figure 220]
[Figure 221]
[Figure 222]
[Figure 223]
[Figure 224]
[Figure 225]
[Figure 226]
[Figure 227]
[Figure 228]
[Figure 229]
[Figure 230]
< >
page |< < (134) of 458 > >|
172134Apollonij Pergæi
VIII.
CONI SIMILES ſunt, quorum axes æquè ad baſes inclinati,
ad diametros baſium proportionales ſunt.
IX.
Et dicitur conus continere ſectionem, & ſectio in cono po-
ſita eſse, ſi ſectio tota fuerit in ſuperſicie coni, aut cadat in illa,
ſi producatur ex parte baſis.
NOTÆ.
DEſinitiones huius ſeſti libri ferè omnes ſunt Appollonij, in paucis quidem
alteratæ ab interprete Arabico:
quod quidem conſtat teſtimonio Eutocij
Aſcalonitæ, qui in tertiam propoſitionem ſecundi æquiponder antium Archime-
dis affert definitionem ſimilium portionum conicarum ſectionum, traditam ab
Apollonio in eius ſeſto libro:
& ſanè ordo doctrinæ exigebat, vt prius ſectio-
nes æquales, &
ſimiles definirentur, vt poſtea earum symptomata demonſtrari
poſſent:
ſed animaduertendum eſt, hactenus nomen ſectionis conicæ ſignificaſſe
quamlibet indeterminatam portionem curuæ lineæ in coni ſuper ſicie ortam ex ſe-
ctione alicuius plani non per verticem coni ducti, non conſiderando termiuos eius
neque menſuram.
Segmentum verò ſignificat portionem aliquam ſectionis conicæ
determinatæ menſuræ, &
certis finibus terminatam; at multoties ſignificat ſu-
perficiem à coniſectione, &
recta linea eam ſubtendente contenta. Igitur ad
confuſionem vitandam vocabo huiuſmodi ſuperficiem planam, Mixtam ſuperficiẽ
ſectionis conicæ.
Modò in relatis definitionibus prius quænam coniſectiones vo-
cari debeant inter ſe æquales exponit Apollonius.
I. Et primo; Si fuerint duæ quælibet coni-
170[Figure 170] ſectiones B A C, E D F, quarum axes A G,
D H;
vertices verò A, & D, & ſiquidem
intelligatur ſectio B A C ſuperpoſita ſectioni
E D F, vt nimirum vertex A ſuper verti-
cem D cadat, atque axis A G ſuper axim
D H, atque pariter peripheriæ B A C, &
E
D F ſibi mutuò congruant:
tunc quidem vo-
cantur duæ dictæ ſectiones conicæ æquales in-
ter ſe.
V bi notandum eſt, non oportere lon-
gitudinem curuæ B A C æqualem eſſe longi-
tudini curuæ E D F;
ſicuti, vt duo anguli
rectilinei dicantur æquales, &
ſibi mu-
tuò congruentes, neceſſe non eſt, vt rectæ li-
neæ, angulos continentes, ſint æquales longi-
tudine, dummodo certum ſit, quod lineæ ipſæ
vlterius productæ ſemper ſibi mutuò congruant;
ſic pariter peripheriæ conicarũ
ſectionum A B, &
D E, ſi vlterius producantur, ſemper ſibi mutuò congruent.

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index