Apollonius <Pergaeus> - Apollonii Pergaei Conicorvm Lib. V. VI. VII. paraphraste Abalphato Asphahanensi : nunc primum editi ; additvs in calce Archimedis assvmptorvm liber, ex codibvs arabicis mss Abrahamus Ecchellensis Maronita latinos reddidit, Jo. Alfonsvs Borellvs curam in geometricis versione contulit & [et] notas vberiores in vniuersum opus adiecit

Scan	Original
61	23
62	24
63	25
64	26
65	27
66	28
67	29
68	30
69	31
70	32
71	33
72	34
73	35
74	36
75	37
76	38
77	39
78	40
79	41
80	42
81	43
82	44
83	45
84	46
85	47
86	48
87	49
88	50
89	51
90	52

202164Apollonij Pergæi tis potius, quàm demonſtrantis

219[Figure 219] eſſet dicere. Eo quod H F, ad
F b poſita fuit vt C B ad B a;
vbi nam, aut quando hoc ſuppo-
ſitum eſt, ſi in definitione non
continetur? Nec ſuspicari po-
teſt caſu hæc verba in textu ir-
repſiß, cum in alĳs locis repe-
tantur, & ab eis pendeat tota
demonſtratio; igitur in defini-
tione vulgata addenda eſt illa
particula, abſciſſæ fint in ea-
dem ratione ad erecta;

Rurſus in propoſ. II. & I.
parte 12. quando concluſio demonſtrationis eſt quod ſectiones A B, E F ſimi-
les ſint: tunc quidem quia tenetur oſtendere Apollonius definitionem traditam,
conuenire ſectionibus A B, E F, non aßumit incautè abſciſſas homologas C B,
H F, ſed ait in II. propoſitionc ponamus C B ad B D vt H F ad F I, &
in 12. inquit, nam pofuimus H F ad F b vt C B ad B a & c. Poſtea in pro-
poſitione 16. litera a: ergo M A ad A P, ideſt abſciſſa ad erectum eſt vt O
C ad C Q, ſeu vt homologa abſcißa ad latus rectum, & angulus O æqualis
eſt M: patet igitur, vt diximus in II. ex 6. quod ſi, & c. Ex quibus locis
ſatis apertè colligitur ( ni fallor ) id quod ſupra rationibus non leuibus inſi-
nuaui, quod abſciſſæ proportionales eſſe debent erectis in ſectionibus ſimilibus.

220[Figure 220]

Sed hic animaduertendum eſt, eandem definitionem non poſſe æquè aptari ſe-
ctionibus conicis, atque ſegmentis conicis ſimilibus, vt perperam cenſuit Mydor-
gius: nam in ſegmentis conicis ſimilibus A B C, & D E F diametrorum æquè
ad baſes inclinatarum abſciſſæ homologæ ex ſui natura determinatæ ſunt, quan-
doquidem non poßunt eße maiores, neque minores quàm G B, & H E, quæ inter
baſes A C, & D F ſegmentorum conicorum, & vertices B, E intercipiuntur;
at ſi in conicis ſectionibus A B S, & K F G ſint axes tranſuerſis a B, & b F
11Propof.
12. huius
lib. I. ad ſua latera recta B D, & F I in eadem proportione, tunc quidem ſimiles e-
runt curuæ lineæ A B S, & K F G, quæ poßunt habere indeterminatas, & mul-
tiplices longitudines, immo poßunt in inſinitum prolongari, ſi fuerint

Page concordance

Text layer

Text normalization

Search

Scan	Original
61	23
62	24
63	25
64	26
65	27
66	28
67	29
68	30
69	31
70	32
71	33
72	34
73	35
74	36
75	37
76	38
77	39
78	40
79	41
80	42
81	43
82	44
83	45
84	46
85	47
86	48
87	49
88	50
89	51
90	52

Scan	Original
61	23
62	24
63	25
64	26
65	27
66	28
67	29
68	30
69	31
70	32
71	33
72	34
73	35
74	36
75	37
76	38
77	39
78	40
79	41
80	42
81	43
82	44
83	45
84	46
85	47
86	48
87	49
88	50
89	51
90	52

Scan	Original
61	23
62	24
63	25
64	26
65	27
66	28
67	29
68	30
69	31
70	32
71	33
72	34
73	35
74	36
75	37
76	38
77	39
78	40
79	41
80	42
81	43
82	44
83	45
84	46
85	47
86	48
87	49
88	50
89	51
90	52