Apollonius <Pergaeus>, Apollonii Pergaei Conicorvm Lib. V. VI. VII. paraphraste Abalphato Asphahanensi : nunc primum editi ; additvs in calce Archimedis assvmptorvm liber, ex codibvs arabicis mss Abrahamus Ecchellensis Maronita latinos reddidit, Jo. Alfonsvs Borellvs curam in geometricis versione contulit & [et] notas vberiores in vniuersum opus adiecit

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 301]
[Figure 302]
[Figure 303]
[Figure 304]
[Figure 305]
[Figure 306]
[Figure 307]
[Figure 308]
[Figure 309]
[Figure 310]
[Figure 311]
[Figure 312]
[Figure 313]
[Figure 314]
[Figure 315]
[Figure 316]
[Figure 317]
[Figure 318]
[Figure 319]
[Figure 320]
[Figure 321]
[Figure 322]
[Figure 323]
[Figure 324]
[Figure 325]
[Figure 326]
[Figure 327]
[Figure 328]
[Figure 329]
[Figure 330]
< >
page |< < (409) of 458 > >|
448409Aſſumpt. Liber. recta linea E G ſecatur in A extrema, ac media ratione, cuius maius ſegmen-
tum eſt E A latus decagoni, &
recta A H ſimiliter diuiditur in G, cuius ma-
ius ſegmentum eſt G H decagoni latus, &
tota E H ſecatur in A, & G ex-
trema, ac media ratione, pariterque recta E B ſimiliter ſecatur in H, cuius
523[Figure 523] minus ſegmentum H B eſt æquale lateri exagoni circulo inſcripti.
Breuius ta-
men propoſitio ſic demonſtrari poſſet.
Quia oſtenſa eſt C D æqualis D G, & A D æqualis eſt eidem D C; cum
ambo ſint latera decagoni, ergo D G æqualis eſt D A.
Poſtea iuncta A C, quid
angulus A H D, vel C H D quinta pars eſt duorum rectorum, ergo angulus
C D H ad baſim iſoſcelij, duæ quintæ partes erit duorum rectorum, &
ideo an-
gulus C D H duplus erit anguli D H E, eſtque externus angulus C D H æqua-
lis duobus internis, &
oppoſitis D H E, & D E H in triangulo D E H, ergo
angulus C D H duplus quoque erit reliqui anguli E, &
propterea angulus D
H E æqualis erit angulo E, &
ſubtenſa latera D E, D H æqualia quoque erunt,
ſed prius D A, D G æqualia erant ſubtendentia angulos æquales, &
reliqui
anguli eiuſdem ſpeciei ſunt, igitur E A æqualis eſt H G.
Reliqua manifeſta
ſunt.
In præfatione huius operis memini non eße omnino improbabile hunc libellum
Archimedis non alium fuiſſe ab illo antiquo lemmatum libro ab Eutocio reper-
to, quod præcipuè ex verbis eiuſdem Eutocij in Comment.
propoſit. 4. lib. 2. de
Sphæra, &
Cylindro comprobatum fuit: illa fideliſſimè translata ex textu Græco ab
amicis doctiſſimis cum iam in præfatione excuſa eßent aliam tranſlationem ex
Arabico Manuſcripto Sereniſſimi Magni Ducis miſit Excell.
Abrahamus Ecchel-
lenſis deſumptam ex editione Abuſahli Alkuhi qui pariter librum ordinatio-
nis lemmatum Archimedis conſcripſit, vt in proemio huius operis teſtatur
Almochtaſſo.
Verba eius ſunt hæc, quæ paulo clarius propoſitum confirmare vi-
dentur:
& meminit Eutocius Aſcalonita in Comment. huius libri, quod
Archimedes promiſerit demonſtrationem huius in hoc ſuo libro, quod
in nullo exemplari reperitur, quod promiſit.
Atque ita vnuſquiſque tam
Dyoniſodorus, quàm Diocles poſt illum progreſſus eſt per aliam viam,
quàm ille (ſcilicet Archimedes) in hoc libro in diuiſione Sphæræ in
duas partes, quæ datam habeant proportionem.
Dixit, & ego reperi

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index