Apollonius <Pergaeus>, Apollonii Pergaei Conicorvm Lib. V. VI. VII. paraphraste Abalphato Asphahanensi : nunc primum editi ; additvs in calce Archimedis assvmptorvm liber, ex codibvs arabicis mss Abrahamus Ecchellensis Maronita latinos reddidit, Jo. Alfonsvs Borellvs curam in geometricis versione contulit & [et] notas vberiores in vniuersum opus adiecit

Table of contents

< >
[171.] PROPOSITIO IV.
[172.] PROPOSITIO X.
[173.] Notæ in Propoſit. I.
[174.] Notæ in Propoſit. II.
[175.] Notæ in Propoſit. IV.
[176.] Notæ in Propoſit. X.
[177.] SECTIO SECVNDA Continens Propoſit. III. VI. VII. & IX. PROPOSITIO III.
[178.] PROPOSITIO VI.
[179.] PROPOSITIO VII.
[180.] PROPOSITIO IX.
[181.] Notæ in Propoſit. III.
[182.] Notæ in Propoſit. VI.
[183.] Notæ in Propoſit. VII.
[184.] Notæ in Propoſit. IX.
[185.] LEMMAI.
[186.] SECTIO TERTIA Continens Propoſit. V. & VIII. PROPOSITIO V.
[187.] PROPOSITIO VIII.
[188.] Notæ in Propoſit. V.
[189.] Notæ in Propoſit. VIII.
[190.] SECTIO QVARTA Continens Propoſit. XI. XII. XIII. & XIV. PROPOSITIO XI.
[191.] PROPOSITIO XII.
[192.] PROPOSITIO XIII.
[193.] PROPOSITIO XIV.
[194.] MONITVM.
[195.] LEMMA II.
[196.] COROLLARIVM.
[197.] LEMMA III.
[198.] LEMMA IV.
[199.] COROLLARIVM.
[200.] LEMMAV.
< >
page |< < (10) of 458 > >|
4810Apollonij Pergæi
Notæ in propoſitionem quintam.
ERit I M æqualis M O, & c. Propter parallelas M O, C H, & ſimilitudi-
11a nem triangulorum I M O, &
I C H.
Ergo quadratum
16[Figure 16]22b I L duplum eſt triã-
guli I C H, &
c. Eo
quod quadratum I L
æquale eſt duobus qua-
dratis I M, M L in
rectangulo triangulo I
M L;
Quadratis au-
tẽ I M, &
L M æqua-
lia ſunt triangulum
I M O bis ſumptum
cum trapezio C M Q
H bis ſumpto;
& quia
331. huius. trapezium C M Q H
æquale eſt trapezio C
M O H, cum triangu-
lo H O Q;
at triangulo I M O,
&
trapezio C M Q H ſimul ſum-
ptis æqualia ſunt triangulum
I C H, cum triangulo H O Q.
Ergo quadratum L I æquale erit
duplo trianguli I C H cum duplo
trianguli H O Q.
Deindè ponamus in ellipſi
44c Y F æqualem D C, &
in hy-
perbola, &
c. Textus videtur
corruptus, quem ſic corrigendum
puto.
Ponamus γ F in ellipſi æ-
qualem differentiæ, &
in hyper-
bola æqualem aggregato D C, &
C F.
Propter ſimilitudinem triangulorum, & c. Sunt enim duæ rectæ lineæ C G,
55d&
V H æquidiſtantes, quæ ſecant rectas lineas conuenientes in Q, & O.
Erit H V æqualis V O, & c. Eo quòd M I oſtenſa eſt æqualis M O, eſtque
66e H V ad V O in eadem proportione æqualitatis propter iam dictam ſimilitudinem
triangulorum.
Igitur V O ad V Q eſt, vt D C ad C F, & conuerſa proportione dein-
77f dè componendo in hyperbola, &
inuertendo in ellipſi fiet in hyperbola
Q O ad O V, &
c. Textum corruptum, atque confuſum clariùs exponi poſſe
cenſeo per Lemma inferius appoſitum hac ratione.
Et comparando ſummas in
hyperbola, &
differentias terminorum in ellipſi ad antecedentes.
Vt Y F ad Y C, & in ellipſi, vt F C ad C F, & Y F in ellipſi æqualis
88g

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index